Eli Lilly
PharmaceuticalsPrompt performance
Position when mentioned · grouped by stageHead to head
Who the models name more often, side by side.
Is this you?
Get the full audit: every losing prompt, the exact answers, and the source changes that move the index.
Request an audit — $299 Or check one customer question free, in seconds →Ranked either side
Healthcare, nearest on the index.
See all healthcare and pharmaceutical companies →What the numbers say
Eli Lilly scores 44.3 out of 100 on the Fameproof index, ranking 49 of 186 companies measured in the run of 26 October 2026. The index is the mean of the per-model scores below.
Visibility is uneven across models: ChatGPT scores it 61.0 while Claude scores it 35.0, a gap of 26.0 points. A brand that is strong on one model and weak on another has a different problem from one that is mid-table everywhere.
ChatGPT names Eli Lilly in 63% of answers and places it early enough to score 39% on prominence; Claude names it in 31%.
Across the 24-prompt panel there are 12 prompts where at least one model does not name Eli Lilly at all — those are the answers a competitor is winning instead, and the prompt table above shows which.
Measured inside pharmaceuticals rather than the wide healthcare pool, Eli Lilly scores 57.3 — the fairer question for a buyer already shopping that market, though it cannot be compared across markets.
Questions about this score
What is Eli Lilly's AI visibility score?
Eli Lilly scores 44.3 out of 100 on the Fameproof index, ranked 49 of 186 companies, measured on 26 October 2026 across Claude and ChatGPT and Gemini.
Which AI model mentions Eli Lilly most?
ChatGPT, at 61.0 out of 100, naming Eli Lilly in 63% of the answers in its panel. The per-model breakdown is above.
How is Eli Lilly's score measured?
With a panel of 24 category questions asked 4 times per model — never questions that name Eli Lilly, because a prompt that names you guarantees a mention. The score combines how often it is named, how early in the answer, how much of the topic it covers, and how consistent the result is between repetitions. Full methodology.
