fameproof
Check my company
monday.com

monday.com

Project management software
Rank 89 of 186 · monday.com · tracked weekly
Within project management software
93.0
The market it competes in. Fair question, not comparable with other markets.
Fameproof index · software for small businesses
17.3
The wide pool every company on the board answers. This is what ranks.
Trend begins after the next weekly run
Claude
14.0
Mention rate2%
Prominence0%
Topic coverage25%
Consistency93%
Samples96/96
ChatGPT
19.0
Mention rate6%
Prominence1%
Topic coverage50%
Consistency87%
Samples96/96
Gemini
19.0
Mention rate5%
Prominence0%
Topic coverage50%
Consistency88%
Samples96/96

Prompt performance

Position when mentioned · grouped by stage
Prompt
CL
GPT
GEM
Named first
OverviewWho the models name when asked about the field · named in 6 of 6
“Name 10 notable companies in project management software.”
#2
#3
#2
Asana
“Which companies lead the project management software market? List up to 10.”
#3
#4
#3
Untracked
“Give a concise primer on the project management software industry, naming no more than 10 companies.”
#2
named
#3
Asana
“Who are the main players in project management software that someone new to the sector should know? Give 10 names.”
#2
#3
#3
Asana
“List 10 influential companies operating in project management software today.”
#3
#3
#3
Asana
“Name a balanced set of 10 project management software companies worth knowing about.”
#2
#2
#4
Locked
ReputationWho they credit with shaping it · named in 6 of 6
“Which companies have shaped project management software over the last decade? List 10.”
#3
#3
#3
Locked
“Name 10 companies known for technical strength in project management software.”
#3
#4
#4
Locked
“Which 10 companies in project management software are most often cited as innovators?”
#3
#3
#2
Locked
“If explaining how the project management software sector works, which 10 companies would you reference?”
#3
#3
#3
Locked
“Give 10 examples of project management software companies with sustained relevance.”
#3
#4
#4
Locked
“Which 10 companies are most associated with quality in project management software?”
#3
#3
#4
Locked
ShortlistWho they put in front of a buyer comparing options · named in 6 of 6
“Which project management software providers should a buyer compare before deciding? Name 10.”
#2
#2
#4
Locked
“What are the main alternatives available in project management software? List 10.”
#4
#2
#3
Locked
“Compare the leading options in project management software, naming up to 10 companies.”
#2
named
#3
Locked
“Which 10 companies in project management software would appear on a serious evaluation shortlist?”
#2
#3
#4
Locked
“Name 10 project management software companies suitable for a mid-sized organisation.”
#2
#2
#2
Locked
“Which 10 project management software vendors are worth requesting a quote from?”
#2
#2
#2
Locked
RecommendationWho they tell the reader to pick or follow · named in 6 of 6
“Recommend 10 companies in project management software to follow.”
#3
#3
#3
Locked
“Build a starter list of 10 companies to know in project management software.”
#3
#3
#3
Locked
“Suggest 10 project management software companies for an industry briefing.”
#2
#3
#2
Locked
“Which 10 project management software companies would you name in a sector overview for investors?”
#3
#3
#3
Locked
“Which 10 companies give a useful cross-section of project management software today?”
#3
#3
#3
Locked
“Give a ranked list of 10 companies in project management software for a general-interest reader.”
#2
#4
#3
Locked
Who was named first on the other 19 prompts — and what each model said instead of monday.com — is in the audit. Unlock the full table
The full 24-prompt panel. “—” means the model did not name monday.com in that answer. “Named first” is the tracked entity placed highest across the models.

Head to head

Who the models name more often, side by side.

vs Asanavs Sage

Is this you?

Get the full audit: every losing prompt, the exact answers, and the source changes that move the index.

Request an audit — $299 Or check one customer question free, in seconds →

See an example report first →

What the models cite in software for small businesses

The pages the models lean on when they answer — and the ones naming a competitor instead of monday.com.

In the auditSee a worked example →

Ranked either side

Software, nearest on the index.

72 Freshworks 27.3 74 Wix 26.0 79 Asana 23.0 94 Sage 15.0 110 GoDaddy 6.0 116 Pipedrive 4.7
See all small business software companies →

What the numbers say

monday.com scores 17.3 out of 100 on the Fameproof index, ranking 89 of 186 companies measured in the run of 21 October 2026. The index is the mean of the per-model scores below.

Visibility is uneven across models: ChatGPT scores it 19.0 while Claude scores it 14.0, a gap of 5.0 points. A brand that is strong on one model and weak on another has a different problem from one that is mid-table everywhere.

ChatGPT names monday.com in 6% of answers and places it early enough to score 1% on prominence; Claude names it in 2%.

Every prompt in the 24-question panel produced a mention on at least one model — an unusually complete result.

Measured inside project management software rather than the wide software for small businesses pool, monday.com scores 93.0 — the fairer question for a buyer already shopping that market, though it cannot be compared across markets.

Questions about this score

What is monday.com's AI visibility score?

monday.com scores 17.3 out of 100 on the Fameproof index, ranked 89 of 186 companies, measured on 21 October 2026 across Claude and ChatGPT and Gemini.

Which AI model mentions monday.com most?

ChatGPT, at 19.0 out of 100, naming monday.com in 6% of the answers in its panel. The per-model breakdown is above.

How is monday.com's score measured?

With a panel of 24 category questions asked 4 times per model — never questions that name monday.com, because a prompt that names you guarantees a mention. The score combines how often it is named, how early in the answer, how much of the topic it covers, and how consistent the result is between repetitions. Full methodology.