ScreenPal

Screen capture software

Rank 164 of 186 · screenpal.com · tracked weekly

Within screen capture and recording software

43.0

The market it competes in. Fair question, not comparable with other markets.

Fameproof index · software for small businesses

0.0

The wide pool every company on the board answers. This is what ranks.

Trend begins after the next weekly run

Claude

0.0

Mention rate0%

Prominence0%

Topic coverage0%

Consistency0%

Samples96/96

ChatGPT

0.0

Mention rate0%

Prominence0%

Topic coverage0%

Consistency0%

Samples96/96

Gemini

0.0

Mention rate0%

Prominence0%

Topic coverage0%

Consistency0%

Samples96/96

Prompt performance

Position when mentioned · grouped by stage

Prompt

GPT

GEM

Named first

OverviewWho the models name when asked about the field · named in 6 of 6

“Name 10 notable companies in screen capture and recording software.”

—

TechSmith

“Which companies lead the screen capture and recording software market? List up to 10.”

—

#10

TechSmith

“Give a concise primer on the screen capture and recording software industry, naming no more than 10 companies.”

—

TechSmith

“Who are the main players in screen capture and recording software that someone new to the sector should know? Give 10 names.”

#10

—

TechSmith

“List 10 influential companies operating in screen capture and recording software today.”

—

TechSmith

“Name a balanced set of 10 screen capture and recording software companies worth knowing about.”

#10

ReputationWho they credit with shaping it · named in 6 of 6

“Which companies have shaped screen capture and recording software over the last decade? List 10.”

#10

—

“Name 10 companies known for technical strength in screen capture and recording software.”

—

#10

“Which 10 companies in screen capture and recording software are most often cited as innovators?”

—

“If explaining how the screen capture and recording software sector works, which 10 companies would you reference?”

—

“Give 10 examples of screen capture and recording software companies with sustained relevance.”

#10

“Which 10 companies are most associated with quality in screen capture and recording software?”

#10

—

ShortlistWho they put in front of a buyer comparing options · named in 6 of 6

“Which screen capture and recording software providers should a buyer compare before deciding? Name 10.”

#10

“What are the main alternatives available in screen capture and recording software? List 10.”

—

“Compare the leading options in screen capture and recording software, naming up to 10 companies.”

—

named

“Which 10 companies in screen capture and recording software would appear on a serious evaluation shortlist?”

#10

“Name 10 screen capture and recording software companies suitable for a mid-sized organisation.”

“Which 10 screen capture and recording software vendors are worth requesting a quote from?”

RecommendationWho they tell the reader to pick or follow · named in 6 of 6

“Recommend 10 companies in screen capture and recording software to follow.”

#10

“Build a starter list of 10 companies to know in screen capture and recording software.”

#10

“Suggest 10 screen capture and recording software companies for an industry briefing.”

“Which 10 screen capture and recording software companies would you name in a sector overview for investors?”

“Which 10 companies give a useful cross-section of screen capture and recording software today?”

—

“Give a ranked list of 10 companies in screen capture and recording software for a general-interest reader.”

#10

Who was named first on the other 19 prompts — and what each model said instead of ScreenPal — is in the audit. Unlock the full table

The full 24-prompt panel. “—” means the model did not name ScreenPal in that answer. “Named first” is the tracked entity placed highest across the models.

Head to head

Who the models name more often, side by side.

vs Loom vs Bandicam

Is this you?

Get the full audit: every losing prompt, the exact answers, and the source changes that move the index.

Request an audit — $299 Or check one customer question free, in seconds →

See an example report first →

What the models cite in software for small businesses

The pages the models lean on when they answer — and the ones naming a competitor instead of ScreenPal.

In the auditSee a worked example →

Ranked either side

Software, nearest on the index.

160 DigitalOcean 0.0 161 Namecheap 0.0 162 TechSmith 0.0 163 Loom 0.0 165 Bandicam 0.0 166 Movavi 0.0

See all small business software companies →

What the numbers say

ScreenPal scores 0.0 out of 100 on the Fameproof index, ranking 164 of 186 companies measured in the run of 21 October 2026. The index is the mean of the per-model scores below.

The models broadly agree: Claude 0.0, ChatGPT 0.0, Gemini 0.0, within 0.0 points of each other.

Claude names ScreenPal in 0% of answers and places it early enough to score 0% on prominence; Gemini names it in 0%.

Across the 24-prompt panel there are 13 prompts where at least one model does not name ScreenPal at all — those are the answers a competitor is winning instead, and the prompt table above shows which.

Measured inside screen capture and recording software rather than the wide software for small businesses pool, ScreenPal scores 43.0 — the fairer question for a buyer already shopping that market, though it cannot be compared across markets.

Questions about this score

What is ScreenPal's AI visibility score?

ScreenPal scores 0.0 out of 100 on the Fameproof index, ranked 164 of 186 companies, measured on 21 October 2026 across Claude and ChatGPT and Gemini.

Which AI model mentions ScreenPal most?

Claude, at 0.0 out of 100, naming ScreenPal in 0% of the answers in its panel. The per-model breakdown is above.

How is ScreenPal's score measured?

With a panel of 24 category questions asked 4 times per model — never questions that name ScreenPal, because a prompt that names you guarantees a mention. The score combines how often it is named, how early in the answer, how much of the topic it covers, and how consistent the result is between repetitions. Full methodology.