DuckDuckGo
Search & advertisingPrompt performance
Position when mentioned · grouped by stageHead to head
Who the models name more often, side by side.
Is this you?
Get the full audit: every losing prompt, the exact answers, and the source changes that move the index.
Request an audit — $299 Or check one customer question free, in seconds →Ranked either side
Technology, nearest on the index.
See all technology companies →What the numbers say
DuckDuckGo scores 4.7 out of 100 on the Fameproof index, ranking 121 of 186 companies measured in the run of 21 October 2026. The index is the mean of the per-model scores below.
Visibility is uneven across models: Claude scores it 14.0 while Gemini scores it 0.0, a gap of 14.0 points. A brand that is strong on one model and weak on another has a different problem from one that is mid-table everywhere.
Claude names DuckDuckGo in 4% of answers and places it early enough to score 2% on prominence; Gemini names it in 0%.
Across the 24-prompt panel there are 24 prompts where at least one model does not name DuckDuckGo at all — those are the answers a competitor is winning instead, and the prompt table above shows which.
Measured inside search and digital advertising rather than the wide technology pool, DuckDuckGo scores 6.3 — the fairer question for a buyer already shopping that market, though it cannot be compared across markets.
Questions about this score
What is DuckDuckGo's AI visibility score?
DuckDuckGo scores 4.7 out of 100 on the Fameproof index, ranked 121 of 186 companies, measured on 21 October 2026 across Claude and ChatGPT and Gemini.
Which AI model mentions DuckDuckGo most?
Claude, at 14.0 out of 100, naming DuckDuckGo in 4% of the answers in its panel. The per-model breakdown is above.
How is DuckDuckGo's score measured?
With a panel of 24 category questions asked 4 times per model — never questions that name DuckDuckGo, because a prompt that names you guarantees a mention. The score combines how often it is named, how early in the answer, how much of the topic it covers, and how consistent the result is between repetitions. Full methodology.
