Mailchimp
Email marketingPrompt performance
Position when mentioned · grouped by stageHead to head
Who the models name more often, side by side.
Is this you?
Get the full audit: every losing prompt, the exact answers, and the source changes that move the index.
Request an audit — $299 Or check one customer question free, in seconds →Ranked either side
Software, nearest on the index.
See all small business software companies →What the numbers say
Mailchimp scores 39.7 out of 100 on the Fameproof index, ranking 54 of 186 companies measured in the run of 21 October 2026. The index is the mean of the per-model scores below.
Visibility is uneven across models: Claude scores it 47.0 while ChatGPT scores it 30.0, a gap of 17.0 points. A brand that is strong on one model and weak on another has a different problem from one that is mid-table everywhere.
Claude names Mailchimp in 49% of answers and places it early enough to score 27% on prominence; ChatGPT names it in 11%.
Across the 24-prompt panel there is 1 prompt where at least one model does not name Mailchimp at all — those are the answers a competitor is winning instead, and the prompt table above shows which.
Measured inside email marketing rather than the wide software for small businesses pool, Mailchimp scores 96.0 — the fairer question for a buyer already shopping that market, though it cannot be compared across markets.
Questions about this score
What is Mailchimp's AI visibility score?
Mailchimp scores 39.7 out of 100 on the Fameproof index, ranked 54 of 186 companies, measured on 21 October 2026 across Claude and ChatGPT and Gemini.
Which AI model mentions Mailchimp most?
Claude, at 47.0 out of 100, naming Mailchimp in 49% of the answers in its panel. The per-model breakdown is above.
How is Mailchimp's score measured?
With a panel of 24 category questions asked 4 times per model — never questions that name Mailchimp, because a prompt that names you guarantees a mention. The score combines how often it is named, how early in the answer, how much of the topic it covers, and how consistent the result is between repetitions. Full methodology.