Coca-Cola
BeveragesPrompt performance
Position when mentioned · grouped by stageHead to head
Who the models name more often, side by side.
Is this you?
Get the full audit: every losing prompt, the exact answers, and the source changes that move the index.
Request an audit — $299 Or check one customer question free, in seconds →Ranked either side
Consumer, nearest on the index.
What the numbers say
Coca-Cola scores 68.3 out of 100 on the Fameproof index, ranking 25 of 186 companies measured in the run of 26 October 2026. The index is the mean of the per-model scores below.
Visibility is uneven across models: Gemini scores it 71.0 while Claude scores it 66.0, a gap of 5.0 points. A brand that is strong on one model and weak on another has a different problem from one that is mid-table everywhere.
Gemini names Coca-Cola in 82% of answers and places it early enough to score 42% on prominence; Claude names it in 72%.
Across the 24-prompt panel there are 3 prompts where at least one model does not name Coca-Cola at all — those are the answers a competitor is winning instead, and the prompt table above shows which.
Measured inside beverages rather than the wide consumer goods pool, Coca-Cola scores 89.0 — the fairer question for a buyer already shopping that market, though it cannot be compared across markets.
Questions about this score
What is Coca-Cola's AI visibility score?
Coca-Cola scores 68.3 out of 100 on the Fameproof index, ranked 25 of 186 companies, measured on 26 October 2026 across Claude and ChatGPT and Gemini.
Which AI model mentions Coca-Cola most?
Gemini, at 71.0 out of 100, naming Coca-Cola in 82% of the answers in its panel. The per-model breakdown is above.
How is Coca-Cola's score measured?
With a panel of 24 category questions asked 4 times per model — never questions that name Coca-Cola, because a prompt that names you guarantees a mention. The score combines how often it is named, how early in the answer, how much of the topic it covers, and how consistent the result is between repetitions. Full methodology.