Danone
Packaged foodPrompt performance
Position when mentioned · grouped by stageHead to head
Who the models name more often, side by side.
Is this you?
Get the full audit: every losing prompt, the exact answers, and the source changes that move the index.
Request an audit — $299 Or check one customer question free, in seconds →Ranked either side
Consumer, nearest on the index.
See all consumer goods brands →What the numbers say
Danone scores 12.0 out of 100 on the Fameproof index, ranking 99 of 186 companies measured in the run of 26 October 2026. The index is the mean of the per-model scores below.
Visibility is uneven across models: Gemini scores it 22.0 while Claude scores it 0.0, a gap of 22.0 points. A brand that is strong on one model and weak on another has a different problem from one that is mid-table everywhere.
Gemini names Danone in 5% of answers and places it early enough to score 0% on prominence; Claude names it in 0%.
Across the 24-prompt panel there are 14 prompts where at least one model does not name Danone at all — those are the answers a competitor is winning instead, and the prompt table above shows which.
Measured inside packaged food rather than the wide consumer goods pool, Danone scores 46.0 — the fairer question for a buyer already shopping that market, though it cannot be compared across markets.
Questions about this score
What is Danone's AI visibility score?
Danone scores 12.0 out of 100 on the Fameproof index, ranked 99 of 186 companies, measured on 26 October 2026 across Claude and ChatGPT and Gemini.
Which AI model mentions Danone most?
Gemini, at 22.0 out of 100, naming Danone in 5% of the answers in its panel. The per-model breakdown is above.
How is Danone's score measured?
With a panel of 24 category questions asked 4 times per model — never questions that name Danone, because a prompt that names you guarantees a mention. The score combines how often it is named, how early in the answer, how much of the topic it covers, and how consistent the result is between repetitions. Full methodology.
