Kraft Heinz
Packaged foodPrompt performance
Position when mentioned · grouped by stageHead to head
Who the models name more often, side by side.
Is this you?
Get the full audit: every losing prompt, the exact answers, and the source changes that move the index.
Request an audit — $299 Or check one customer question free, in seconds →Ranked either side
Consumer, nearest on the index.
What the numbers say
Kraft Heinz scores 24.0 out of 100 on the Fameproof index, ranking 78 of 186 companies measured in the run of 26 October 2026. The index is the mean of the per-model scores below.
Visibility is uneven across models: Claude scores it 32.0 while Gemini scores it 18.0, a gap of 14.0 points. A brand that is strong on one model and weak on another has a different problem from one that is mid-table everywhere.
Claude names Kraft Heinz in 23% of answers and places it early enough to score 2% on prominence; Gemini names it in 2%.
Across the 24-prompt panel there are 3 prompts where at least one model does not name Kraft Heinz at all — those are the answers a competitor is winning instead, and the prompt table above shows which.
Measured inside packaged food rather than the wide consumer goods pool, Kraft Heinz scores 78.3 — the fairer question for a buyer already shopping that market, though it cannot be compared across markets.
Questions about this score
What is Kraft Heinz's AI visibility score?
Kraft Heinz scores 24.0 out of 100 on the Fameproof index, ranked 78 of 186 companies, measured on 26 October 2026 across Claude and ChatGPT and Gemini.
Which AI model mentions Kraft Heinz most?
Claude, at 32.0 out of 100, naming Kraft Heinz in 23% of the answers in its panel. The per-model breakdown is above.
How is Kraft Heinz's score measured?
With a panel of 24 category questions asked 4 times per model — never questions that name Kraft Heinz, because a prompt that names you guarantees a mention. The score combines how often it is named, how early in the answer, how much of the topic it covers, and how consistent the result is between repetitions. Full methodology.
