Goldman Sachs
Investment bankingPrompt performance
Position when mentioned · grouped by stageHead to head
Who the models name more often, side by side.
Is this you?
Get the full audit: every losing prompt, the exact answers, and the source changes that move the index.
Request an audit — $299 Or check one customer question free, in seconds →Ranked either side
Finance, nearest on the index.
What the numbers say
Goldman Sachs scores 60.3 out of 100 on the Fameproof index, ranking 31 of 186 companies measured in the run of 26 October 2026. The index is the mean of the per-model scores below.
Visibility is uneven across models: Claude scores it 69.0 while Gemini scores it 52.0, a gap of 17.0 points. A brand that is strong on one model and weak on another has a different problem from one that is mid-table everywhere.
Claude names Goldman Sachs in 77% of answers and places it early enough to score 44% on prominence; Gemini names it in 58%.
Across the 24-prompt panel there are 3 prompts where at least one model does not name Goldman Sachs at all — those are the answers a competitor is winning instead, and the prompt table above shows which.
Measured inside investment banking rather than the wide financial services pool, Goldman Sachs scores 89.7 — the fairer question for a buyer already shopping that market, though it cannot be compared across markets.
Questions about this score
What is Goldman Sachs's AI visibility score?
Goldman Sachs scores 60.3 out of 100 on the Fameproof index, ranked 31 of 186 companies, measured on 26 October 2026 across Claude and ChatGPT and Gemini.
Which AI model mentions Goldman Sachs most?
Claude, at 69.0 out of 100, naming Goldman Sachs in 77% of the answers in its panel. The per-model breakdown is above.
How is Goldman Sachs's score measured?
With a panel of 24 category questions asked 4 times per model — never questions that name Goldman Sachs, because a prompt that names you guarantees a mention. The score combines how often it is named, how early in the answer, how much of the topic it covers, and how consistent the result is between repetitions. Full methodology.