Goldman Sachs
Investment bankingNot measured in this run.
Goldman Sachs scores 73.5 out of 100 on the Fameproof index, ranking 19 of 120 companies measured in the run of 5 August 2026. The index is the mean of the per-model scores below.
Visibility is uneven across models: ChatGPT scores it 79.0 while Gemini scores it 68.0, a gap of 11.0 points. A brand that is strong on one model and weak on another has a different problem from one that is mid-table everywhere.
ChatGPT names Goldman Sachs in 83% of answers and places it early enough to score 67% on prominence; Gemini names it in 75%.
Across the 24-prompt panel there are 3 prompts where at least one model does not name Goldman Sachs at all — those are the answers a competitor is winning instead, and the table below shows which.
Measured inside investment banking rather than the wide financial services pool, Goldman Sachs scores 88.5 — the fairer question for a buyer already shopping that market, though it cannot be compared across markets.
Prompt performance
Position when mentionedHead to head
Who the models name more often, side by side.
Is this you?
Get the full audit: every losing prompt, the exact answers, and the source changes that move the index.
Request an audit — $299Ranked either side
Finance, nearest on the index.
Questions about this score
What is Goldman Sachs's AI visibility score?
Goldman Sachs scores 73.5 out of 100 on the Fameproof index, ranked 19 of 120 companies, measured on 5 August 2026 across ChatGPT and Gemini.
Which AI model mentions Goldman Sachs most?
ChatGPT, at 79.0 out of 100, naming Goldman Sachs in 83% of the answers in its panel. The per-model breakdown is above.
How is Goldman Sachs's score measured?
With a panel of 24 category questions asked 4 times per model — never questions that name Goldman Sachs, because a prompt that names you guarantees a mention. The score combines how often it is named, how early in the answer, how much of the topic it covers, and how consistent the result is between repetitions. Full methodology.