Mastercard
PaymentsPrompt performance
Position when mentioned · grouped by stageHead to head
Who the models name more often, side by side.
Is this you?
Get the full audit: every losing prompt, the exact answers, and the source changes that move the index.
Request an audit — $299 Or check one customer question free, in seconds →Ranked either side
Finance, nearest on the index.
What the numbers say
Mastercard scores 63.0 out of 100 on the Fameproof index, ranking 30 of 186 companies measured in the run of 26 October 2026. The index is the mean of the per-model scores below.
Visibility is uneven across models: Gemini scores it 66.0 while Claude scores it 60.0, a gap of 6.0 points. A brand that is strong on one model and weak on another has a different problem from one that is mid-table everywhere.
Gemini names Mastercard in 71% of answers and places it early enough to score 45% on prominence; Claude names it in 67%.
Across the 24-prompt panel there are 5 prompts where at least one model does not name Mastercard at all — those are the answers a competitor is winning instead, and the prompt table above shows which.
Measured inside payments rather than the wide financial services pool, Mastercard scores 75.0 — the fairer question for a buyer already shopping that market, though it cannot be compared across markets.
Questions about this score
What is Mastercard's AI visibility score?
Mastercard scores 63.0 out of 100 on the Fameproof index, ranked 30 of 186 companies, measured on 26 October 2026 across Claude and ChatGPT and Gemini.
Which AI model mentions Mastercard most?
Gemini, at 66.0 out of 100, naming Mastercard in 71% of the answers in its panel. The per-model breakdown is above.
How is Mastercard's score measured?
With a panel of 24 category questions asked 4 times per model — never questions that name Mastercard, because a prompt that names you guarantees a mention. The score combines how often it is named, how early in the answer, how much of the topic it covers, and how consistent the result is between repetitions. Full methodology.
